How many times have we heard: “But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.”
Of course, Spooner was an Anarchist with an agenda. His followers like to condemn the Constitution for failing to 'self-execute' - though not one document in History has ever done so.
Here's an intelligent piece refuting the notion of the Spooner approach.